MB2-700 test MB3-700 test MB6-869 test OG0-093 test VCP-510 test VCP550 test 070-178 test 070-331 test 400-101 test 70-410 test 070-341 exams 070-417 exams 070-457 exams 400-101 exams 70-410 exams 050-SEPROAUTH-02 exams 200-120 exams MB2-703 exams 070-462 exams 70-462 exams 70-461 exams 070-410 exams JN0-102 exams 70-411 exams C_TADM51_731 exams C4090-958 exams 70-483 exams EX300 70-412 dumps 70-458 dumps 70-486 dumps 820-421 dumps 820-422 dumps C2170-008 dumps C2180-275 dumps C2180-276 dumps C4040-123 dumps JN0-343 dumps 400-101 dumps 70-410 dumps 050-SEPROAUTH-02 dumps 200-120 dumps MB2-703 dumps C2180-278 HP0-J73 exams ICBB exams 070-246 exams 070-341 exams 070-417 exams HP0-S41 HP2-B115 C4040-251 101 9L0-422 70-534 98-349 70-341 300-208 700-501 CCA-500 N10-005 70-243 E10-001 350-018 C_TSCM52_66 C_A1FIN_10 EX300 DEV-501 70-680 C_HANASUP_1 700-701 98-367 77-881 70-688 70-683 1Z0-062 70-466 200-101 70-489 200-120 220-801 100-101 200-101 3I0-012 exams 500-051 exams 640-461 exams 640-864 exams 642-813 exams 642-832 exams 700-038 exams 70-410 exams 70-496 exams 70-646 exams 70-680 exams 70-684 exams 74-343 exams 77-888 exams 98-361 exams A2010-505 exams A4040-226 exams C_GRCAC_10 exams C_HANAIMP131 exams C_TBW45_70 exams C_TBW55_73 exams C_TFIN52_66 exams C2010-570 exams C2020-001 exams C2020-702 exams C2020-703 exams C2040-406 exams C2040-407 exams C2040-840 exams C2050-241 exams C2070-588 exams C2180-400 exams C4060-156 exams C4090-451 exams CAT-060 exams CCA-410 exams CLO-001 exams CSSGB exams CV0-001 exams E20-335 exams HP0-Y46 exams IBMSPSSMPRO exams M2020-615 exams M2070-640 exams MB6-886 exams MB7-700 exams N10-005 exams SK0-003 exams ST0-237 exams VCP5-DCV exams 3101 exams 3107 exams 3300 exams 400-101 exams 70-410 exams 050-SEPROAUTH-02 exams 200-120 exams MB2-703 exams 070-462 exams 70-462 exams 70-461 exams 070-410 exams JN0-102 exams 70-411 exams C_TADM51_731 exams C4090-958 exams 70-483 exams EX300 exams 070-461 exams MB2-702 exams MB7-702 exams 220-802 exams 400-101 exams 646-206 exams 700-501 exams 70-480 exams C4040-108 exams MB2-701 exams 070-411 exams 100-101 exams 640-554 exams 700-505 exams 70-457 exams 70-460 exams

Board of Supervisors undermine the community by opposing SB54

By Randy Villegas

Attorneys, Immigrant rights advocates, and local citizens took the podium last week on Tuesday to try and convince the Kern County Board of Supervisors not to oppose Senate Bill 54.

SB54, commonly referred to as the “Sanctuary State” bill, would limit law enforcement’s ability to “detain a person due to a hold request, respond to federal immigration enforcement’s requests for notification or provide information about a person’s release date unless that’s already available publicly.”

The Board did not listen and instead voted 4-1 to draft a resolution in opposition to SB54. Supervisor Perez casted the opposing vote.

The board’s vote not only undermines the constituency that overwhelmingly spoke in favor of SB54 at the meeting, but it undermines the community that they are supposed to serve.

Just a week earlier, hundreds of community members gathered across the street from the Board of Supervisor’s building on May Day to march and advocate for a more inclusive Kern County. One that embraces undocumented immigrants and acknowledges their contributions to our city, our county, our state, and our nation.

Some people have a misconception that undocumented immigrants come to the United States, get on welfare, and do not contribute to our economy. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

Undocumented immigrants do not qualify for welfare or many social services. Instead they contribute toward our economy by paying taxes for social services which they are ineligible for.

One recent study by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) found that:

 

  • Undocumented immigrants contribute roughly $3 billion in taxes to California each year, over $1.5 billion of which goes to county coffers.
  • Undocumented immigrants paid $32.8 million in taxes to Kern County (in the form of property taxes and local sales taxes).
  • Undocumented immigrants from Kern paid nearly $31.4 million in taxes to the state of California (in the form of personal income taxes and sales and excise taxes).  
  • It is estimated that legalizing undocumented residents would lead to an additional $8.6 million in revenue by increasing undocumented immigrants’ effective tax rate, thereby increasing their state and local tax contributions.

 

Sheriff Donny Youngblood, who had previously attempted to declare Kern County a “non sanctuary” county, led the opposition to SB54. Youngblood fear baited and argued that his hands would be tied and that dangerous criminals would be released on the streets if the bill passes.

Attorney A.J. Sala illustrated that was simply not true. “SB54 would require the parole board and CA department of corrections to notify ICE of the scheduled release of all inmates who have any violent or serious felony conviction or any inmate with a prior violent or serious offense.”

Sala is also one of the attorneys leading the Immigration Justice Collaborative, a coalition of lawyers that have lead workshops and public meetings to inform residents about “their rights” when it comes to immigration.

Reflecting on his own experiences, Sala spoke about a case where an undocumented woman who was a victim of Domestic Violence was afraid to contact the police.

“She is afraid to contact law enforcement because the perpetrator of the crime will call Immigration on them,” Salas stated.

It is a sad day when these four supervisors prioritize partisan politics over the wellbeing of their community members. If crime rates go down, it may not be because of this “law and order” rhetoric, but it may be because crime is being underreported. Families are living in fear of calling the very law enforcement agencies that are supposed to protect them.

In a county where the sheriff is constantly asking for more money in our limited budget, our local law enforcement agencies should not be utilizing its resources to help federal agents.  

Although Youngblood claimed that his department was not arresting innocent immigrants and working with ICE to deport them, one lawyer challenged this. Christiana Osorio, an attorney from Eaton and associates, claimed that, “Last week an individual was not charged with any criminal offense. Despite the fact that he wasn’t charged with a crime, he was detained, and by way of the sheriff’s department, he was turned over to ICE and is now subject to removal proceedings.”

Osorio also stated that this was a very clear violation to the California TRUST Act.

For someone who likes to preach Law and Order, Youngblood has constantly violated the TRUST Act and state law. Instead of trying to build a relationship with the immigrant community and encouraging cooperation to find real criminals, Youngblood has resorted to scapegoating immigrants in order to further his political agenda.

History shows us the brutal cycle of oppression that immigrants have faced in California. A cycle of immigrants being abused for their labor and then scapegoated by men with no political spine.

Immigrants built our railroads. Immigrants perform back breaking work in our fields every single day, while the rest of the country literally enjoys the fruits of their labor.  Immigrants brought the great diversity that we see today. Immigrants have fought for this country and continue to fight for our country to this day. From the Chinese Exclusion Act to the Japanese internment and the infamous “Operation Wetback,” immigrants have been abused, jailed, and deported from a land that they saw as an opportunity for a better life.

Now is the time to learn from our history and not repeat it. Now is the time to protect our immigrant communities and embrace them.

I hope that our California State Assembly has the courage to stand up with Supervisor Perez and not fall where these 4 men failed. Our Golden State has a golden opportunity to truly bring to life to the words in our pledge of allegiance.

A California for all people:
“With Liberty and Justice for All.”

 

Be the first to comment on "Board of Supervisors undermine the community by opposing SB54"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*



7 − two =